Aequs Ltd IPO 2025: Should You Invest in India’s Aerospace Precision Manufacturing Pioneer?

Executive Summary

Aequs Ltd., a 25-year-old precision component manufacturer for aerospace giants like Boeing and Airbus, is launching a ₹921.81 crore initial public offering (IPO) in December 2025. Despite serving high-barrier entry markets with strong relationships with global aerospace leaders, the company remains loss-making with a net loss of ₹102.35 crores in FY25. This comprehensive analysis examines whether this aerospace manufacturing IPO deserves a place in your portfolio.

Quick Verdict Box:

  • For Listing Gains: SUBSCRIBE (Moderate institutional interest, lower valuations vs peers)
  • For Long-term Investment: WAIT & WATCH (Monitor profitability trajectory, debt reduction progress)
  • Risk Level: HIGH (Loss-making, high debt dependency, concentrated customer base)

🎯 Aequs IPO Key Highlights at a Glance {#aequs-ipo-key-highlights}

Infographic: Aequs Ltd. IPO key highlights at a glance – ₹922 Cr book-built issue opens Dec 3, price band ₹118-124, listing BSE/NSE Dec 10

Lead Managers

  • JM Financial Ltd
  • IIFL Capital Services Ltd
  • Kotak Mahindra Capital Co. Ltd

Registrar

  • Kfin Technologies Ltd

🏢 Company Overview: Understanding Aequs Limited

The Genesis Story

Incorporated in 2000, Aequs Ltd has evolved from a training company into one of India’s leading precision manufacturing enterprises. Headquartered in Bengaluru, the company operates a Special Economic Zone (SEZ) offering fully vertically integrated manufacturing capabilities primarily for the aerospace sector.

What Does Aequs Manufacture?

Aequs specializes in precision-engineered components for mission-critical applications. Their product portfolio includes:

Aerospace Segment (89% Revenue – FY25)

  1. Engine Systems Components
    • Housing assemblies
    • Manifolds and mounting flanges
    • Actuator pistons
    • Jack heads and radarbox components
  2. Landing Systems
    • Main landing gear assemblies
    • Main fittings and bracket assemblies
    • Wheel rims and half wheels
    • Uplock mechanisms
  3. Aircraft Structures
    • Brackets and corner fittings
    • Wing flap supports
    • Cable quadrants
    • Gearbox brackets and floor boards
  4. Cargo & Interiors
    • Power distribution unit trays
    • Side panels and seat assemblies
    • Panel structures and housing components

Consumer Segment (11% Revenue – FY25)

  • Cookware for premium brands (Tupperware)
  • Toys and action figures (Hasbro, Spin Master)
  • Consumer electronics components
  • Precision plastic products

Manufacturing Footprint

Aequs operates three integrated manufacturing clusters across continents:

  • India: Primary manufacturing hub with end-to-end capabilities
  • France: Strategic presence near Airbus facilities
  • United States: Proximity to Boeing and major OEMs

This multi-geography strategy ensures supply chain resilience and faster response times to customer requirements.

💼 Business Model: The One-Stop Manufacturing Solution

Competitive Advantages

1. Vertically Integrated Operations

Unlike competitors who specialize in single processes, Aequs offers complete manufacturing solutions under one roof:

  • Forging: Initial metal shaping
  • Precision Machining: High-tolerance finishing
  • Surface Treatment: Corrosion resistance and durability
  • Assembly: Final product integration
  • Testing & Quality Control: Aerospace-grade certifications

This integration reduces lead times from 8-9 months and eliminates coordination challenges with multiple suppliers.

2. High Entry Barriers

The aerospace industry demands:

  • Stringent quality certifications (AS9100, NADCAP)
  • Multi-year qualification processes
  • Proven reliability track records
  • Substantial capital investments
  • Technical expertise in tight-tolerance manufacturing

Once qualified, suppliers enjoy sticky customer relationships with high switching costs.

3. Blue-Chip Customer Base

Aequs serves as a Tier-1 supplier to:

  • Airbus: A220, A320, A330, A350 programs
  • Boeing: B737, B777, B787 programs
  • Major aerospace OEMs and system integrators

As of September 2025, the company manufactures over 5,000 products across various aircraft platforms.

4. Scale and Specialization

  • 1,892 full-time employees
  • 1,834 contractual employees
  • 432 apprentices (skill development pipeline)
  • Advanced CNC machining centers
  • Automated forging and treatment facilities

📈 Financial Performance Analysis

Revenue Trends (Consolidated – ₹ Crores)

PeriodTotal IncomeYoY GrowthAerospaceConsumer
FY23840.54~605 (72%)~235 (28%)
FY24988.30+17.6%
FY25959.21-3.0%~853 (89%)~106 (11%)
H1 FY26565.55

Key Financial Observations

Revenue Dynamics

  1. Aerospace Segment Growth: Despite overall revenue decline, aerospace revenue grew ~9% YoY in FY25
  2. Consumer Segment Contraction: Major customer (Hasbro) order reduction led to segment shrinkage from 28% to 11%
  3. Business Mix Improvement: Higher contribution from high-margin aerospace offsets low-margin consumer products

Profitability Challenges

MetricFY23FY24FY25H1 FY26
EBITDA63.06145.51107.9784.11
EBITDA Margin7.5%14.7%11.3%14.9%
PAT-109.50-14.24-102.35-16.98
PAT Margin-13.0%-1.4%-10.7%-3.0%

Critical Insight: While EBITDA is positive and improving (11.7% consolidated, 20-25% in aerospace division), the company remains loss-making due to:

  • High Depreciation: Capital-intensive machinery requires substantial depreciation charges
  • Interest Costs: Working capital financing for 8-9 month conversion cycles
  • Consumer Segment Losses: Legacy consumer business drags overall profitability

Balance Sheet Health

MetricFY25Status
Total Assets₹1,859.84 CrGrowing asset base
Net Worth₹707.53 CrPositive equity
Total Borrowings₹437.06 CrModerate debt
Debt-to-Equity0.62xAcceptable leverage
Current RatioWorking capital intensive

Debt Management: Company’s debt-to-equity ratio of 0.62x is manageable for a manufacturing enterprise, though the working capital cycle creates cash flow pressures.

Return Metrics

  • ROE: -14.30% (Loss-making)
  • ROCE: 0.87% (Barely positive)
  • RoNW: -14.47% (Negative returns)

💰 IPO Fund Utilization: Where Your Money Goes

Objects of the Issue

PurposeAmount (₹ Cr)% of Fresh Issue
Debt Repayment/Prepayment433.1764.7%
↳ Parent Company17.55
↳ AeroStructures Mfg India Pvt Ltd174.82
↳ Aequs Consumer Products Pvt Ltd231.16
↳ Aequs Engineered Plastics Pvt Ltd9.63
Capital Expenditure (Machinery)64.009.6%
↳ Parent Company8.11
↳ AeroStructures Mfg India (via investment)55.89
General Corporate Purposes172.8325.8%

Analysis of Fund Deployment

Positive Aspects

  1. Debt Reduction Priority: 64.7% allocation to debt repayment will:
    • Reduce interest burden (improving PAT)
    • Strengthen balance sheet
    • Lower financial risk
    • Improve credit ratings
  2. Strategic Capex: ₹64 crores for machinery indicates:
    • Capacity expansion for growing aerospace orders
    • Technology upgrades for precision manufacturing
    • Operational efficiency improvements
  3. Financial Flexibility: General corporate purposes allocation provides working capital cushion for the long conversion cycle business

⚠️ Concerns

  1. Limited Growth Capex: Only 9.6% for capacity expansion seems modest given industry growth potential
  2. Subsidiary Focus: Major debt in consumer products subsidiary (₹231 Cr) – a loss-making segment
  3. No R&D Allocation: Technology-intensive business needs continuous innovation investment

🎯 Investment Thesis: Why Consider Aequs IPO?

✅ Reasons to Invest (Bull Case)

1. Massive Industry Tailwinds

Global Aerospace Market Growth:

  • Current Size: $132 billion (2025)
  • Projected Size: $235 billion (2030)
  • CAGR: 10% per annum

Drivers:

  • Post-COVID aviation recovery
  • Rising middle-class travel in Asia
  • Aircraft fleet modernization
  • Increased defense spending globally
  • “Make in India” aerospace initiatives

2. Strategic Positioning in High-Barrier Industry

  • Tier-1 supplier status with Boeing and Airbus
  • Multi-year qualification provides moat
  • Complex certifications create competitive advantage
  • Sticky customer relationships with high switching costs
  • 70% revenue from top 5 customers shows trust

3. Improving Business Mix

  • Aerospace contribution increased from 72% (FY23) to 89% (FY25)
  • Consumer segment de-risking (from 28% to 11%)
  • Aerospace EBITDA margins: 20-25% vs consolidated 11.7%
  • Potential profitability as consumer segment shrinks

4. Margin Expansion Potential

Post-IPO Scenario:

  • Debt reduction → Lower interest costs
  • Operating leverage → Better EBITDA conversion
  • Aerospace focus → Higher margin product mix
  • Capacity utilization → Improved efficiency

Estimate: PAT could turn positive in FY26-27 with debt reduction and revenue growth

5. Defense Manufacturing Opportunity

  • Company entering defense precision components
  • Existing aerospace expertise transferable
  • Government’s defense indigenization push
  • Lower demand volatility vs commercial aerospace
  • Long-term contracts with stable revenues

6. Founder-Led Management

  • Promoter: Aravind Melligeri (experienced entrepreneur)
  • Founder-driven vision and execution
  • Long-term commitment (post-IPO holding TBD)
  • Technical expertise in precision manufacturing

7. Reasonable Valuation (Relative)

Price-to-Book Comparison (at upper price band):

CompanyP/B Ratio3-Yr Revenue CAGR
Aequs9.94xNegative
Dixon Technologies~15-20x40%+
Kaynes Technology~12-15x35%+
Azad Engineering~8-10x25%+

While not cheap, Aequs trades at a discount to pure-play electronics manufacturers like Dixon and Kaynes, though comparable to aerospace peer Azad Engineering.

8. Export-Focused Revenue

  • Majority revenue from exports (USD-denominated)
  • Natural hedge against rupee volatility
  • Access to global aerospace supply chains
  • Quality standards aligned with international norms

⚠️ Reasons to be Cautious (Bear Case)

1. 25 Years Without Profitability

Critical Red Flag: Despite being established in 2000, Aequs remains loss-making:

  • FY23 PAT: -₹109.50 Cr
  • FY24 PAT: -₹14.24 Cr
  • FY25 PAT: -₹102.35 Cr

Questions Raised:

  • Why hasn’t scale translated to profitability?
  • Are business fundamentals structurally challenged?
  • Can IPO proceeds actually turn the tide?

2. Negative Return on Equity

  • ROE: -14.30%
  • ROCE: 0.87% (barely positive)
  • Shareholders have not earned positive returns historically
  • Capital allocation efficiency questionable

3. Working Capital Intensive

  • 8-9 month conversion cycle from order to payment
  • Continuous working capital financing needed
  • High interest burden impacts profitability
  • Cash flow negative despite positive EBITDA

4. Customer Concentration Risk

  • 70% revenue from top 5 customers
  • Heavy dependence on Boeing and Airbus
  • Aerospace industry cyclicality exposure
  • Single customer loss could be devastating

5. Industry Cyclicality

Aerospace Sector Risks:

  • Economic slowdowns reduce air travel
  • Aircraft order cancellations/delays
  • Geopolitical tensions impact defense spending
  • Supply chain disruptions (as seen during COVID)

6. Consumer Segment Performance

  • Despite 25 years, consumer business remains loss-making
  • Hasbro order reduction led to revenue collapse
  • Low margins in toys and cookware
  • Management execution concerns

7. High Debt Despite IPO

Even after ₹433 Cr debt repayment:

  • Residual debt remains
  • Debt-to-Equity improves but doesn’t eliminate
  • Interest costs continue (though reduced)
  • Financial leverage persists

8. Competitive Landscape

India Aerospace Manufacturing:

  • Growing competition from established players
  • New entrants attracted by industry growth
  • Pricing pressures in global supply chains
  • Technology disruption risks

9. Valuation Concerns

P/B of 9.94x for a loss-making company raises questions:

  • No earnings to justify Price-to-Earnings
  • Book value may not reflect true asset quality
  • Premium pricing for uncertain profitability

10. Execution Track Record

  • Slow revenue growth (3% CAGR FY23-25)
  • Multiple business pivots historically
  • Consumer segment missteps
  • Profitability timeline uncertain

🔍 Peer Comparison: How Does Aequs Stack Up?

Key Competitors Analysis

Azad Engineering Ltd

  • Focus: Aerospace & defense forgings
  • Status: Profitable, positive PAT
  • Margin: Better EBITDA margins
  • Growth: Consistent revenue trajectory
  • Valuation: P/B ~8-10x

Dixon Technologies

  • Focus: Consumer electronics manufacturing
  • Status: Highly profitable
  • Growth: 40%+ revenue CAGR
  • Margin: 15%+ PAT margins
  • Valuation: P/B ~15-20x (premium justified)

Kaynes Technology

  • Focus: Electronics manufacturing services
  • Status: Profitable growth story
  • Growth: 35%+ revenue CAGR
  • Margin: Strong double-digit PAT
  • Valuation: P/B ~12-15x

Aequs Positioning: Among peers, Aequs is the only loss-making entity but commands a P/B of 9.94x, suggesting market is pricing in future profitability turnaround.

📊 Valuation Metrics Deep Dive

Pre-IPO vs Post-IPO Metrics

MetricPre-IPOPost-IPO
Shares Outstanding6.17 Cr6.71 Cr
EPS-₹1.66-₹0.51 (annualized H1 FY26)
P/E RatioNot meaningful (negative)Not meaningful
Book Value~₹115~₹105 (post-dilution)
P/B Ratio9.94x(at ₹124)

Is the Valuation Justified?

For P/B of 9.94x to be justified, investors need:

  1. Clear path to profitability within 2-3 years
  2. Sustained aerospace revenue growth (15%+ CAGR)
  3. EBITDA margin expansion to 15%+ consolidated
  4. Successful debt reduction improving PAT
  5. Defense segment revenue contribution

Without above triggers, current valuation appears optimistic.

🎲 Risk Assessment Matrix

Risk CategoryLevelMitigation
Profitability Risk🔴 HighDebt reduction, segment focus
Customer Concentration🟡 MediumDiversification efforts
Working Capital🟡 MediumIPO proceeds, better terms
Industry Cyclicality🟡 MediumDefense diversification
Execution Risk🟡 MediumFounder-led focus
Valuation Risk🟡 MediumGrowth potential justification
Debt Risk🟢 LowPost-IPO balance sheet improvement

💡 Who Should Invest in Aequs IPO?

✅ Suitable For:

  1. Risk-Tolerant Investors: Comfortable with turnaround stories
  2. Long-Term Horizon: 3-5 year investment perspective
  3. Sectoral Believers: Bullish on India aerospace growth
  4. Portfolio Diversifiers: Seeking aerospace exposure
  5. HNI/Institutional Players: Can absorb volatility

❌ Not Suitable For:

  1. Conservative Investors: Seeking stable, profitable companies
  2. Short-Term Traders: Uncertain listing gains
  3. Risk-Averse Retirees: Negative cash flows concerning
  4. Income Seekers: No dividend visibility
  5. Capital Preservation Focus: Principal protection not assured

🎯 Expert Recommendation

Our Rating: NEUTRAL TO CAUTIOUSLY POSITIVE ⭐⭐⭐☆☆

For Listing Gains Perspective (Short-Term)

Rating: SUBSCRIBE 🟢

Rationale:

  • Moderate to strong institutional interest expected
  • Aerospace theme attracts investor attention
  • Post-COVID aviation recovery narrative
  • IPO supply-demand dynamics may favor listing pop
  • Grey market premium (if any) suggests interest

Suggested Approach: Apply for 1-2 retail lots for listing gains

For Long-Term Investment (3-5 Years)

Rating: NEUTRAL 🟡

Rationale:

Positives:

  • ✅ Industry growth tailwinds (10% CAGR)
  • ✅ High entry barrier business
  • ✅ Blue-chip customer base
  • ✅ Debt reduction improving financials
  • ✅ Improving business mix (aerospace focus)

Negatives:

  • ❌ 25 years without profitability
  • ❌ Negative ROE and ROCE
  • ❌ Working capital intensive
  • ❌ Execution track record concerns
  • ❌ Stretched valuation for loss-making entity

Suggested Approach:

  • Conservative Investors: AVOID or wait for post-listing clarity
  • Aggressive Investors: Consider 1-2% portfolio allocation
  • Monitor Triggers: Q1 FY26 results, debt reduction progress, aerospace order book

📋 Investment Decision Framework

Before Applying, Ask Yourself:

1. Financial Health Check

  • ✅ Have surplus funds beyond emergency corpus?
  • ✅ Can hold for 3+ years if listing disappoints?
  • ✅ Comfortable with potential 20-30% downside?

2. Portfolio Fit

  • ✅ Need aerospace sector exposure?
  • ✅ Have other high-risk growth stocks?
  • ✅ Portfolio diversification adequate?

3. Expectations Clarity

  • 🎯 Listing gains focus? (Apply 1-2 lots)
  • 🎯 Long-term wealth creation? (Need conviction)
  • 🎯 Sectoral bet? (Compare with Azad Engineering)

4. Risk Tolerance

  • ⚠️ Can handle negative surprises?
  • ⚠️ Comfortable with loss-making companies?
  • ⚠️ Patient for turnaround (2-3 years)?

🔮 Future Outlook & Triggers to Monitor

Positive Triggers (Upside Catalysts)

  1. Profitability Milestone: First profitable quarter post-IPO
  2. Major Contract Wins: New Boeing/Airbus program awards
  3. Defense Orders: Government defense manufacturing contracts
  4. Margin Expansion: Consolidated EBITDA crossing 15%
  5. Debt Elimination: Achieving debt-free status
  6. Revenue Acceleration: Aerospace revenue growth >15% YoY
  7. Consumer Exit: Complete exit or turnaround of consumer business

Negative Triggers (Downside Risks)

  1. Continued Losses: No path to profitability in FY26-27
  2. Customer Loss: Any top-5 customer attrition
  3. Margin Compression: EBITDA margins declining below 10%
  4. Debt Increase: Working capital needs increasing debt again
  5. Industry Slowdown: Global aerospace demand downturn
  6. Execution Failures: Missed capacity utilization targets
  7. Cash Burn: Negative operating cash flows persist

❓ Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Is Aequs IPO good for listing gains?

Moderate probability. Aerospace theme and institutional interest may support listing premium of 10-20%, but not guaranteed given loss-making status. Apply with short-term mindset at your own risk assessment.

Why is Aequs still loss-making after 25 years?

High capital intensity (depreciation), interest costs from working capital needs, and legacy consumer segment losses have kept the company in red despite positive EBITDA. Management expects profitability post debt-reduction.

What is the main business of Aequs?

Precision manufacturing of critical aerospace components (89% revenue) for Boeing, Airbus and other aircraft manufacturers. Also has small consumer products division (11%).

How does Aequs compare to Azad Engineering?

Both are aerospace component manufacturers. Azad is profitable with better track record, while Aequs has broader capabilities (forging to assembly) but remains loss-making. Valuations are comparable.

Should I apply for Aequs IPO?

Depends on risk appetite:
High Risk Tolerance + Long-term horizon: Consider 1-2 lots
Conservative investors: Better to avoid or wait
Listing gains seekers: Can apply 1 lot speculatively

When will Aequs become profitable?

Management hasn’t given specific timeline. Analysts expect FY26-27 could see breakeven to positive PAT if debt reduction and aerospace growth materialize as planned.

What are key risks in Aequs IPO?

(1) Continued losses despite scale.
(2) Customer concentration (70% from top 5).
(3) Working capital intensive.
(4) Industry cyclicality.
(5) Execution track record concerns.

How to apply for Aequs IPO?

Through your broker’s IPO application platform (Zerodha, Groww, Upstox, etc.) using UPI or ASBA method between Dec 3-5, 2025.

What is minimum investment in Aequs IPO?

₹14,880 for 1 lot (120 shares at upper price band of ₹124). Retail investors can apply up to ₹1,93,440 (13 lots).

Where will IPO proceeds be used?

65% for debt repayment (₹433 Cr), 10% for machinery capex (₹64 Cr), and 25% for general corporate purposes (₹173 Cr).

📌 Key Takeaways for Investors

✅ Investment Checklist

ParameterStatusVerdict
Industry Growth10% CAGR✅ Positive
Customer QualityBoeing, Airbus✅ Positive
ProfitabilityLoss-making 25 years❌ Negative
Debt LevelsModerate, reducing🟡 Neutral
ValuationP/B 9.94x🟡 Neutral
ManagementFounder-led✅ Positive
Entry BarriersHigh certifications✅ Positive
Revenue GrowthStagnant (3% CAGR)❌ Negative
Business MixImproving (89% aerospace)✅ Positive
Risk-RewardModerate-High risk🟡 Neutral

🎯 Final Verdict Summary

Aequs IPO presents a classic “turnaround story” in a high-growth industry. While the 10% CAGR aerospace market growth, blue-chip customer base, and high entry barriers offer compelling long-term potential, the 25-year track record without profitability and negative returns on equity are serious red flags that cannot be ignored.

Our Balanced View:

  • Listing Gains: Worth a speculative application (1-2 lots)
  • Long-Term Investment: Requires strong conviction and risk appetite
  • Conservative Approach: Wait for 2-3 quarters post-listing to assess execution

Investment Strategy:

  • Aggressive Investors: 1-2% portfolio allocation
  • Moderate Investors: Wait and watch approach
  • Conservative Investors: Better opportunities available

Remember, past performance and current losses don’t guarantee future results—neither success nor failure. Make informed decisions based on your financial goals, risk tolerance, and investment horizon.

📞 Important Information & Disclaimer

Aequs Limited Contact Details

Corporate Office: Aequs Tower, No. 55, Whitefield Main Road, Mahadevapura Post, Bengaluru, Karnataka – 560048

Phone: +91 96 3205 8521
Email: investor.relations@aequs.com
Website: www.aequs.com

IPO Registrar Details

Kfin Technologies Ltd
Phone: 040-6716 2222, 040-7961 1000
Email: aequs.ipo@kfintech.com
Website: ipostatus.kfintech.com

How to Check Allotment Status Of Aequs Ltd IPO

Visit Kfin Technologies’ IPO status page or registrar website using your PAN/Application number after allotment date (Dec 8, 2025).

📢 Disclaimer

This article is for educational and informational purposes only and should not be construed as investment advice. The author and publisher:

  • Are not SEBI registered investment advisors
  • Do not have any positions in Aequs Limited
  • Have prepared this analysis based on publicly available information
  • Cannot guarantee accuracy of all data points
  • Are not liable for any investment decisions or losses

Please note:

  • IPO investments carry market risks
  • Past performance is not indicative of future results
  • Investors should read the Red Herring Prospectus (RHP) carefully
  • Consult with a certified financial advisor before investing
  • Invest only surplus funds you can afford to lose
  • This is not a buy/sell recommendation

Investment decisions are solely your responsibility. Do your own due diligence.

📚 Additional Resources

  • Red Herring Prospectus (RHP): Available on BSE/NSE websites
  • SEBI SCORES: For investor complaints (scores.gov.in)
  • Company Financials: BSE/NSE filings section
  • Peer Comparison: Azad Engineering, Dixon Technologies annual reports

#AequsIPO #IPO2025 #AerospaceInvesting #StockMarketIndia #IPOAnalysis #PrecisionManufacturing

Leave a Comment

Scroll to Top