Ravelcare IPO Review: Is It a Good Investment? Expert Comparison With Mamaearth, Sugar & Wow

The beauty and personal-care (BPC) industry is expanding rapidly worldwide, and investors are searching for the next high-growth brand. With the launch of the Ravelcare IPO, interest has grown around how this young digital-first brand compares to established players like Mamaearth, Wow Skin Science, and Sugar Cosmetics.

In this expert analysis, we break down:

  • Ravelcare’s business model
  • Its financial growth
  • IPO valuation
  • Key risks & strengths
  • Competitor comparison
  • Investment viewpoint

What Is Ravelcare? A Digital-First Beauty Brand With Strong Margins

Ravelcare is a D2C beauty and personal care company offering haircare, skincare, scalp-care, and bodycare products.

  • Personalized digital experiences
  • E-commerce dominance
  • High-margin product categories
  • A data-driven consumer model

The company recently filed for an SME IPO, and the demand has been strong due to impressive profitability.

Ravelcare IPO – Expert Financial Analysis

1. Revenue Growth

Ravelcare’s revenue has expanded from:

  • ₹3.49 Cr (FY23)
  • ₹22.09 Cr (FY24)
  • ₹24.98 Cr (FY25)

This high growth rate signals strong product-market fit and efficient digital distribution.

2. Profitability (A Major USP)

  • EBITDA Margin: ~27%–30%
  • PAT Margin: ~21%
  • ROE/ROCE: 50%–68% (exceptional for early-stage FMCG)

These margins outperform many early-stage BPC brands globally.

3. IPO Valuation (Reasonable & Growth-Friendly)

  • P/E Ratio: ~13.9x
  • Price Band: Competitively priced
  • Use of Funds:
    • Manufacturing unit
    • Brand building
    • R&D
    • Working capital

The valuation is moderate, allowing long-term investors to enter at a fair price.

Why Ravelcare Is Countered As Strong Return IPO

image

Risks You Should Know Before Applying For This IPO

1. Small Scale Compared to Major Competitors

Ravelcare is growing fast but is still tiny in scale — total revenue in FY25 was under ₹25 crore vs. established peers like Mamaearth and other major beauty brands that operate at hundreds to thousands of crores in revenue. This size gap makes market penetration and long-term scaling more challenging.

2. Intense Competition in the Beauty & Personal Care Segment

The beauty category is highly competitive, with strong players backed by deep pockets, both domestic (larger D2C brands) and global FMCG giants. Smaller brands face pricing pressure, frequent discounting, and higher marketing battles for visibility. 

3. Dependence on Online Marketing and Digital Channels

Ravelcare relies heavily on digital ads and e-commerce platforms for customer acquisition. A significant portion of IPO funds (about ₹11.5 cr) is earmarked for marketing, signaling high customer acquisition costs. Fluctuations in ad costs, algorithm changes on platforms like Google or Meta, or policy shifts in marketplaces could squeeze returns. 

4. SME Listing Liquidity & Price Volatility

The IPO is on the BSE SME platform, which typically has lower trading volumes and higher price volatility than mainboard listings. This can make buying or selling shares at preferred prices difficult soon after listing. 

5. Manufacturing & Supply Chain Risks

Currently, Ravelcare depends on a third-party manufacturer. Any disruption in this arrangement — quality issues, delays, or cost changes — may affect production and margins. The planned in-house facility could take time and capital to set up, adding execution risk. 

image 1

Ravelcare vs Mamaearth vs Wow Skin Science vs Sugar Cosmetics

Competition in the BPC industry is intense. Here’s a detailed comparison:

1. Business Model Comparison

Beauty Brands Business Models
BrandBusiness ModelStrength
RavelcareD2C beauty & haircareHigh profitability
Mamaearth (Honasa)Multi-brand FMCGLarge scale, diversified
Sugar CosmeticsMakeup-centricStrong offline expansion
Wow Skin ScienceD2C multi-categoryHigh recall but inconsistent growth

2. Revenue Comparison

Beauty Brands FY Revenue Comparison
BrandFY Revenue (Approx)
Mamaearth₹1900–2100 Cr
Sugar Cosmetics₹415–515 Cr
WOW Skin Science₹230–250 Cr
Ravelcare₹25 Cr

Ravelcare is the smallest, but also one of the most profitable relative to its size.

3. Profitability Comparison

Beauty Brands Profitability Status
BrandProfitability Status
RavelcareProfitable (High margins)
MamaearthProfitable at scale
SugarLoss-making
WOWLoss-making

Ravelcare beats Sugar and WOW in profitability despite being smaller.

4. Growth Trajectory

  • Ravelcare: Fastest % growth from small base
  • Mamaearth: Stable, profitable growth
  • Sugar: Growing but with losses
  • WOW: Revenue contraction, loss reduction phase

Ravelcare resembles an early-stage Mamaearth in momentum, but without the scale yet.

Which Brand Has the Strongest Future Potential? (Expert Verdict)

1. For Investors

  • Mamaearth → safest long-term bet (listed, scalable, profitable).
  • Ravelcare → high-risk, high-reward for early investors.
  • Sugar Cosmetics → growth-focused but risky.
  • WOW Skin Science → needs strong turnaround.

2. For Consumers

Demand is high across haircare and makeup categories, suggesting long-term market stability.

3. For Market Positioning

Ravelcare’s focus on haircare + personalization gives it a niche edge that could scale globally.

Conclusion

The Ravelcare IPO is one of the most interesting SME listings in the beauty care segment. With strong margins, international expansion, and a D2C-driven model, Ravelcare stands out as a profitable early-stage brand ready for scale.

When compared to Mamaearth, Sugar Cosmetics, and WOW Skin Science, Ravelcare shows:

  • Stronger profitability
  • Lower revenue scale
  • Higher growth potential
  • Higher risk due to SME nature

For investors seeking early-stage opportunities in a fast-growing BPC category, Ravelcare is worth tracking closely.

FAQs 

Is Ravelcare IPO a good investment?

Yes, if you are a long-term investor comfortable with SME volatility and believe in digital-first beauty brands.

How does Ravelcare compare to Mamaearth?

Ravelcare is smaller but more profitable at the early stage. Mamaearth is larger, diversified, and more stable..

Which beauty company is most profitable?

Among emerging D2C brands, Ravelcare shows strong margins; among large brands, Mamaearth leads.

Why is Ravelcare growing fast?

Its D2C model, personalized approach, and strong online presence support rapid growth.

Remember: Investment decisions should be based on your financial goals, risk appetite, and due diligence—not on any single expert opinion or review.

Disclaimer: This article is for educational and informational purposes only. It does not constitute financial advice or investment recommendation. Investors should conduct their own research and consult with certified financial advisors before making investment decisions. IPO investments carry market risks. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Leave a Comment

Scroll to Top