Executive Summary
Aequs Ltd., a 25-year-old precision component manufacturer for aerospace giants like Boeing and Airbus, is launching a ₹921.81 crore initial public offering (IPO) in December 2025. Despite serving high-barrier entry markets with strong relationships with global aerospace leaders, the company remains loss-making with a net loss of ₹102.35 crores in FY25. This comprehensive analysis examines whether this aerospace manufacturing IPO deserves a place in your portfolio.
Quick Verdict Box:
- For Listing Gains: SUBSCRIBE (Moderate institutional interest, lower valuations vs peers)
- For Long-term Investment: WAIT & WATCH (Monitor profitability trajectory, debt reduction progress)
- Risk Level: HIGH (Loss-making, high debt dependency, concentrated customer base)
🎯 Aequs IPO Key Highlights at a Glance {#aequs-ipo-key-highlights}

Lead Managers
- JM Financial Ltd
- IIFL Capital Services Ltd
- Kotak Mahindra Capital Co. Ltd
Registrar
- Kfin Technologies Ltd
🏢 Company Overview: Understanding Aequs Limited
The Genesis Story
Incorporated in 2000, Aequs Ltd has evolved from a training company into one of India’s leading precision manufacturing enterprises. Headquartered in Bengaluru, the company operates a Special Economic Zone (SEZ) offering fully vertically integrated manufacturing capabilities primarily for the aerospace sector.
What Does Aequs Manufacture?
Aequs specializes in precision-engineered components for mission-critical applications. Their product portfolio includes:
Aerospace Segment (89% Revenue – FY25)
- Engine Systems Components
- Housing assemblies
- Manifolds and mounting flanges
- Actuator pistons
- Jack heads and radarbox components
- Landing Systems
- Main landing gear assemblies
- Main fittings and bracket assemblies
- Wheel rims and half wheels
- Uplock mechanisms
- Aircraft Structures
- Brackets and corner fittings
- Wing flap supports
- Cable quadrants
- Gearbox brackets and floor boards
- Cargo & Interiors
- Power distribution unit trays
- Side panels and seat assemblies
- Panel structures and housing components
Consumer Segment (11% Revenue – FY25)
- Cookware for premium brands (Tupperware)
- Toys and action figures (Hasbro, Spin Master)
- Consumer electronics components
- Precision plastic products
Manufacturing Footprint
Aequs operates three integrated manufacturing clusters across continents:
- India: Primary manufacturing hub with end-to-end capabilities
- France: Strategic presence near Airbus facilities
- United States: Proximity to Boeing and major OEMs
This multi-geography strategy ensures supply chain resilience and faster response times to customer requirements.
💼 Business Model: The One-Stop Manufacturing Solution
Competitive Advantages
1. Vertically Integrated Operations
Unlike competitors who specialize in single processes, Aequs offers complete manufacturing solutions under one roof:
- Forging: Initial metal shaping
- Precision Machining: High-tolerance finishing
- Surface Treatment: Corrosion resistance and durability
- Assembly: Final product integration
- Testing & Quality Control: Aerospace-grade certifications
This integration reduces lead times from 8-9 months and eliminates coordination challenges with multiple suppliers.
2. High Entry Barriers
The aerospace industry demands:
- Stringent quality certifications (AS9100, NADCAP)
- Multi-year qualification processes
- Proven reliability track records
- Substantial capital investments
- Technical expertise in tight-tolerance manufacturing
Once qualified, suppliers enjoy sticky customer relationships with high switching costs.
3. Blue-Chip Customer Base
Aequs serves as a Tier-1 supplier to:
- Airbus: A220, A320, A330, A350 programs
- Boeing: B737, B777, B787 programs
- Major aerospace OEMs and system integrators
As of September 2025, the company manufactures over 5,000 products across various aircraft platforms.
4. Scale and Specialization
- 1,892 full-time employees
- 1,834 contractual employees
- 432 apprentices (skill development pipeline)
- Advanced CNC machining centers
- Automated forging and treatment facilities
📈 Financial Performance Analysis
Revenue Trends (Consolidated – ₹ Crores)
| Period | Total Income | YoY Growth | Aerospace | Consumer |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY23 | 840.54 | – | ~605 (72%) | ~235 (28%) |
| FY24 | 988.30 | +17.6% | – | – |
| FY25 | 959.21 | -3.0% | ~853 (89%) | ~106 (11%) |
| H1 FY26 | 565.55 | – | – | – |
Key Financial Observations
Revenue Dynamics
- Aerospace Segment Growth: Despite overall revenue decline, aerospace revenue grew ~9% YoY in FY25
- Consumer Segment Contraction: Major customer (Hasbro) order reduction led to segment shrinkage from 28% to 11%
- Business Mix Improvement: Higher contribution from high-margin aerospace offsets low-margin consumer products
Profitability Challenges
| Metric | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | H1 FY26 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EBITDA | 63.06 | 145.51 | 107.97 | 84.11 |
| EBITDA Margin | 7.5% | 14.7% | 11.3% | 14.9% |
| PAT | -109.50 | -14.24 | -102.35 | -16.98 |
| PAT Margin | -13.0% | -1.4% | -10.7% | -3.0% |
Critical Insight: While EBITDA is positive and improving (11.7% consolidated, 20-25% in aerospace division), the company remains loss-making due to:
- High Depreciation: Capital-intensive machinery requires substantial depreciation charges
- Interest Costs: Working capital financing for 8-9 month conversion cycles
- Consumer Segment Losses: Legacy consumer business drags overall profitability
Balance Sheet Health
| Metric | FY25 | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Total Assets | ₹1,859.84 Cr | Growing asset base |
| Net Worth | ₹707.53 Cr | Positive equity |
| Total Borrowings | ₹437.06 Cr | Moderate debt |
| Debt-to-Equity | 0.62x | Acceptable leverage |
| Current Ratio | – | Working capital intensive |
Debt Management: Company’s debt-to-equity ratio of 0.62x is manageable for a manufacturing enterprise, though the working capital cycle creates cash flow pressures.
Return Metrics
- ROE: -14.30% (Loss-making)
- ROCE: 0.87% (Barely positive)
- RoNW: -14.47% (Negative returns)
💰 IPO Fund Utilization: Where Your Money Goes
Objects of the Issue
| Purpose | Amount (₹ Cr) | % of Fresh Issue |
|---|---|---|
| Debt Repayment/Prepayment | 433.17 | 64.7% |
| ↳ Parent Company | 17.55 | – |
| ↳ AeroStructures Mfg India Pvt Ltd | 174.82 | – |
| ↳ Aequs Consumer Products Pvt Ltd | 231.16 | – |
| ↳ Aequs Engineered Plastics Pvt Ltd | 9.63 | – |
| Capital Expenditure (Machinery) | 64.00 | 9.6% |
| ↳ Parent Company | 8.11 | – |
| ↳ AeroStructures Mfg India (via investment) | 55.89 | – |
| General Corporate Purposes | 172.83 | 25.8% |
Analysis of Fund Deployment
✅ Positive Aspects
- Debt Reduction Priority: 64.7% allocation to debt repayment will:
- Reduce interest burden (improving PAT)
- Strengthen balance sheet
- Lower financial risk
- Improve credit ratings
- Strategic Capex: ₹64 crores for machinery indicates:
- Capacity expansion for growing aerospace orders
- Technology upgrades for precision manufacturing
- Operational efficiency improvements
- Financial Flexibility: General corporate purposes allocation provides working capital cushion for the long conversion cycle business
⚠️ Concerns
- Limited Growth Capex: Only 9.6% for capacity expansion seems modest given industry growth potential
- Subsidiary Focus: Major debt in consumer products subsidiary (₹231 Cr) – a loss-making segment
- No R&D Allocation: Technology-intensive business needs continuous innovation investment
🎯 Investment Thesis: Why Consider Aequs IPO?
✅ Reasons to Invest (Bull Case)
1. Massive Industry Tailwinds
Global Aerospace Market Growth:
- Current Size: $132 billion (2025)
- Projected Size: $235 billion (2030)
- CAGR: 10% per annum
Drivers:
- Post-COVID aviation recovery
- Rising middle-class travel in Asia
- Aircraft fleet modernization
- Increased defense spending globally
- “Make in India” aerospace initiatives
2. Strategic Positioning in High-Barrier Industry
- Tier-1 supplier status with Boeing and Airbus
- Multi-year qualification provides moat
- Complex certifications create competitive advantage
- Sticky customer relationships with high switching costs
- 70% revenue from top 5 customers shows trust
3. Improving Business Mix
- Aerospace contribution increased from 72% (FY23) to 89% (FY25)
- Consumer segment de-risking (from 28% to 11%)
- Aerospace EBITDA margins: 20-25% vs consolidated 11.7%
- Potential profitability as consumer segment shrinks
4. Margin Expansion Potential
Post-IPO Scenario:
- Debt reduction → Lower interest costs
- Operating leverage → Better EBITDA conversion
- Aerospace focus → Higher margin product mix
- Capacity utilization → Improved efficiency
Estimate: PAT could turn positive in FY26-27 with debt reduction and revenue growth
5. Defense Manufacturing Opportunity
- Company entering defense precision components
- Existing aerospace expertise transferable
- Government’s defense indigenization push
- Lower demand volatility vs commercial aerospace
- Long-term contracts with stable revenues
6. Founder-Led Management
- Promoter: Aravind Melligeri (experienced entrepreneur)
- Founder-driven vision and execution
- Long-term commitment (post-IPO holding TBD)
- Technical expertise in precision manufacturing
7. Reasonable Valuation (Relative)
Price-to-Book Comparison (at upper price band):
| Company | P/B Ratio | 3-Yr Revenue CAGR |
|---|---|---|
| Aequs | 9.94x | Negative |
| Dixon Technologies | ~15-20x | 40%+ |
| Kaynes Technology | ~12-15x | 35%+ |
| Azad Engineering | ~8-10x | 25%+ |
While not cheap, Aequs trades at a discount to pure-play electronics manufacturers like Dixon and Kaynes, though comparable to aerospace peer Azad Engineering.
8. Export-Focused Revenue
- Majority revenue from exports (USD-denominated)
- Natural hedge against rupee volatility
- Access to global aerospace supply chains
- Quality standards aligned with international norms
⚠️ Reasons to be Cautious (Bear Case)
1. 25 Years Without Profitability
Critical Red Flag: Despite being established in 2000, Aequs remains loss-making:
- FY23 PAT: -₹109.50 Cr
- FY24 PAT: -₹14.24 Cr
- FY25 PAT: -₹102.35 Cr
Questions Raised:
- Why hasn’t scale translated to profitability?
- Are business fundamentals structurally challenged?
- Can IPO proceeds actually turn the tide?
2. Negative Return on Equity
- ROE: -14.30%
- ROCE: 0.87% (barely positive)
- Shareholders have not earned positive returns historically
- Capital allocation efficiency questionable
3. Working Capital Intensive
- 8-9 month conversion cycle from order to payment
- Continuous working capital financing needed
- High interest burden impacts profitability
- Cash flow negative despite positive EBITDA
4. Customer Concentration Risk
- 70% revenue from top 5 customers
- Heavy dependence on Boeing and Airbus
- Aerospace industry cyclicality exposure
- Single customer loss could be devastating
5. Industry Cyclicality
Aerospace Sector Risks:
- Economic slowdowns reduce air travel
- Aircraft order cancellations/delays
- Geopolitical tensions impact defense spending
- Supply chain disruptions (as seen during COVID)
6. Consumer Segment Performance
- Despite 25 years, consumer business remains loss-making
- Hasbro order reduction led to revenue collapse
- Low margins in toys and cookware
- Management execution concerns
7. High Debt Despite IPO
Even after ₹433 Cr debt repayment:
- Residual debt remains
- Debt-to-Equity improves but doesn’t eliminate
- Interest costs continue (though reduced)
- Financial leverage persists
8. Competitive Landscape
India Aerospace Manufacturing:
- Growing competition from established players
- New entrants attracted by industry growth
- Pricing pressures in global supply chains
- Technology disruption risks
9. Valuation Concerns
P/B of 9.94x for a loss-making company raises questions:
- No earnings to justify Price-to-Earnings
- Book value may not reflect true asset quality
- Premium pricing for uncertain profitability
10. Execution Track Record
- Slow revenue growth (3% CAGR FY23-25)
- Multiple business pivots historically
- Consumer segment missteps
- Profitability timeline uncertain
🔍 Peer Comparison: How Does Aequs Stack Up?
Key Competitors Analysis
Azad Engineering Ltd
- Focus: Aerospace & defense forgings
- Status: Profitable, positive PAT
- Margin: Better EBITDA margins
- Growth: Consistent revenue trajectory
- Valuation: P/B ~8-10x
Dixon Technologies
- Focus: Consumer electronics manufacturing
- Status: Highly profitable
- Growth: 40%+ revenue CAGR
- Margin: 15%+ PAT margins
- Valuation: P/B ~15-20x (premium justified)
Kaynes Technology
- Focus: Electronics manufacturing services
- Status: Profitable growth story
- Growth: 35%+ revenue CAGR
- Margin: Strong double-digit PAT
- Valuation: P/B ~12-15x
Aequs Positioning: Among peers, Aequs is the only loss-making entity but commands a P/B of 9.94x, suggesting market is pricing in future profitability turnaround.
📊 Valuation Metrics Deep Dive
Pre-IPO vs Post-IPO Metrics
| Metric | Pre-IPO | Post-IPO |
|---|---|---|
| Shares Outstanding | 6.17 Cr | 6.71 Cr |
| EPS | -₹1.66 | -₹0.51 (annualized H1 FY26) |
| P/E Ratio | Not meaningful (negative) | Not meaningful |
| Book Value | ~₹115 | ~₹105 (post-dilution) |
| P/B Ratio | 9.94x | (at ₹124) |
Is the Valuation Justified?
For P/B of 9.94x to be justified, investors need:
- Clear path to profitability within 2-3 years
- Sustained aerospace revenue growth (15%+ CAGR)
- EBITDA margin expansion to 15%+ consolidated
- Successful debt reduction improving PAT
- Defense segment revenue contribution
Without above triggers, current valuation appears optimistic.
🎲 Risk Assessment Matrix
| Risk Category | Level | Mitigation |
|---|---|---|
| Profitability Risk | 🔴 High | Debt reduction, segment focus |
| Customer Concentration | 🟡 Medium | Diversification efforts |
| Working Capital | 🟡 Medium | IPO proceeds, better terms |
| Industry Cyclicality | 🟡 Medium | Defense diversification |
| Execution Risk | 🟡 Medium | Founder-led focus |
| Valuation Risk | 🟡 Medium | Growth potential justification |
| Debt Risk | 🟢 Low | Post-IPO balance sheet improvement |
💡 Who Should Invest in Aequs IPO?
✅ Suitable For:
- Risk-Tolerant Investors: Comfortable with turnaround stories
- Long-Term Horizon: 3-5 year investment perspective
- Sectoral Believers: Bullish on India aerospace growth
- Portfolio Diversifiers: Seeking aerospace exposure
- HNI/Institutional Players: Can absorb volatility
❌ Not Suitable For:
- Conservative Investors: Seeking stable, profitable companies
- Short-Term Traders: Uncertain listing gains
- Risk-Averse Retirees: Negative cash flows concerning
- Income Seekers: No dividend visibility
- Capital Preservation Focus: Principal protection not assured
🎯 Expert Recommendation
Our Rating: NEUTRAL TO CAUTIOUSLY POSITIVE ⭐⭐⭐☆☆
For Listing Gains Perspective (Short-Term)
Rating: SUBSCRIBE 🟢
Rationale:
- Moderate to strong institutional interest expected
- Aerospace theme attracts investor attention
- Post-COVID aviation recovery narrative
- IPO supply-demand dynamics may favor listing pop
- Grey market premium (if any) suggests interest
Suggested Approach: Apply for 1-2 retail lots for listing gains
For Long-Term Investment (3-5 Years)
Rating: NEUTRAL 🟡
Rationale:
Positives:
- ✅ Industry growth tailwinds (10% CAGR)
- ✅ High entry barrier business
- ✅ Blue-chip customer base
- ✅ Debt reduction improving financials
- ✅ Improving business mix (aerospace focus)
Negatives:
- ❌ 25 years without profitability
- ❌ Negative ROE and ROCE
- ❌ Working capital intensive
- ❌ Execution track record concerns
- ❌ Stretched valuation for loss-making entity
Suggested Approach:
- Conservative Investors: AVOID or wait for post-listing clarity
- Aggressive Investors: Consider 1-2% portfolio allocation
- Monitor Triggers: Q1 FY26 results, debt reduction progress, aerospace order book
📋 Investment Decision Framework
Before Applying, Ask Yourself:
1. Financial Health Check
- ✅ Have surplus funds beyond emergency corpus?
- ✅ Can hold for 3+ years if listing disappoints?
- ✅ Comfortable with potential 20-30% downside?
2. Portfolio Fit
- ✅ Need aerospace sector exposure?
- ✅ Have other high-risk growth stocks?
- ✅ Portfolio diversification adequate?
3. Expectations Clarity
- 🎯 Listing gains focus? (Apply 1-2 lots)
- 🎯 Long-term wealth creation? (Need conviction)
- 🎯 Sectoral bet? (Compare with Azad Engineering)
4. Risk Tolerance
- ⚠️ Can handle negative surprises?
- ⚠️ Comfortable with loss-making companies?
- ⚠️ Patient for turnaround (2-3 years)?
🔮 Future Outlook & Triggers to Monitor
Positive Triggers (Upside Catalysts)
- Profitability Milestone: First profitable quarter post-IPO
- Major Contract Wins: New Boeing/Airbus program awards
- Defense Orders: Government defense manufacturing contracts
- Margin Expansion: Consolidated EBITDA crossing 15%
- Debt Elimination: Achieving debt-free status
- Revenue Acceleration: Aerospace revenue growth >15% YoY
- Consumer Exit: Complete exit or turnaround of consumer business
Negative Triggers (Downside Risks)
- Continued Losses: No path to profitability in FY26-27
- Customer Loss: Any top-5 customer attrition
- Margin Compression: EBITDA margins declining below 10%
- Debt Increase: Working capital needs increasing debt again
- Industry Slowdown: Global aerospace demand downturn
- Execution Failures: Missed capacity utilization targets
- Cash Burn: Negative operating cash flows persist
❓ Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
Is Aequs IPO good for listing gains?
Moderate probability. Aerospace theme and institutional interest may support listing premium of 10-20%, but not guaranteed given loss-making status. Apply with short-term mindset at your own risk assessment.
Why is Aequs still loss-making after 25 years?
High capital intensity (depreciation), interest costs from working capital needs, and legacy consumer segment losses have kept the company in red despite positive EBITDA. Management expects profitability post debt-reduction.
What is the main business of Aequs?
Precision manufacturing of critical aerospace components (89% revenue) for Boeing, Airbus and other aircraft manufacturers. Also has small consumer products division (11%).
How does Aequs compare to Azad Engineering?
Both are aerospace component manufacturers. Azad is profitable with better track record, while Aequs has broader capabilities (forging to assembly) but remains loss-making. Valuations are comparable.
Should I apply for Aequs IPO?
Depends on risk appetite:
High Risk Tolerance + Long-term horizon: Consider 1-2 lots
Conservative investors: Better to avoid or wait
Listing gains seekers: Can apply 1 lot speculatively
When will Aequs become profitable?
Management hasn’t given specific timeline. Analysts expect FY26-27 could see breakeven to positive PAT if debt reduction and aerospace growth materialize as planned.
What are key risks in Aequs IPO?
(1) Continued losses despite scale.
(2) Customer concentration (70% from top 5).
(3) Working capital intensive.
(4) Industry cyclicality.
(5) Execution track record concerns.
How to apply for Aequs IPO?
Through your broker’s IPO application platform (Zerodha, Groww, Upstox, etc.) using UPI or ASBA method between Dec 3-5, 2025.
What is minimum investment in Aequs IPO?
₹14,880 for 1 lot (120 shares at upper price band of ₹124). Retail investors can apply up to ₹1,93,440 (13 lots).
Where will IPO proceeds be used?
65% for debt repayment (₹433 Cr), 10% for machinery capex (₹64 Cr), and 25% for general corporate purposes (₹173 Cr).
📌 Key Takeaways for Investors
✅ Investment Checklist
| Parameter | Status | Verdict |
|---|---|---|
| Industry Growth | 10% CAGR | ✅ Positive |
| Customer Quality | Boeing, Airbus | ✅ Positive |
| Profitability | Loss-making 25 years | ❌ Negative |
| Debt Levels | Moderate, reducing | 🟡 Neutral |
| Valuation | P/B 9.94x | 🟡 Neutral |
| Management | Founder-led | ✅ Positive |
| Entry Barriers | High certifications | ✅ Positive |
| Revenue Growth | Stagnant (3% CAGR) | ❌ Negative |
| Business Mix | Improving (89% aerospace) | ✅ Positive |
| Risk-Reward | Moderate-High risk | 🟡 Neutral |
🎯 Final Verdict Summary
Aequs IPO presents a classic “turnaround story” in a high-growth industry. While the 10% CAGR aerospace market growth, blue-chip customer base, and high entry barriers offer compelling long-term potential, the 25-year track record without profitability and negative returns on equity are serious red flags that cannot be ignored.
Our Balanced View:
- Listing Gains: Worth a speculative application (1-2 lots)
- Long-Term Investment: Requires strong conviction and risk appetite
- Conservative Approach: Wait for 2-3 quarters post-listing to assess execution
Investment Strategy:
- Aggressive Investors: 1-2% portfolio allocation
- Moderate Investors: Wait and watch approach
- Conservative Investors: Better opportunities available
Remember, past performance and current losses don’t guarantee future results—neither success nor failure. Make informed decisions based on your financial goals, risk tolerance, and investment horizon.
📞 Important Information & Disclaimer
Aequs Limited Contact Details
Corporate Office: Aequs Tower, No. 55, Whitefield Main Road, Mahadevapura Post, Bengaluru, Karnataka – 560048
Phone: +91 96 3205 8521
Email: investor.relations@aequs.com
Website: www.aequs.com
IPO Registrar Details
Kfin Technologies Ltd
Phone: 040-6716 2222, 040-7961 1000
Email: aequs.ipo@kfintech.com
Website: ipostatus.kfintech.com
How to Check Allotment Status Of Aequs Ltd IPO
Visit Kfin Technologies’ IPO status page or registrar website using your PAN/Application number after allotment date (Dec 8, 2025).
📢 Disclaimer
This article is for educational and informational purposes only and should not be construed as investment advice. The author and publisher:
- Are not SEBI registered investment advisors
- Do not have any positions in Aequs Limited
- Have prepared this analysis based on publicly available information
- Cannot guarantee accuracy of all data points
- Are not liable for any investment decisions or losses
Please note:
- IPO investments carry market risks
- Past performance is not indicative of future results
- Investors should read the Red Herring Prospectus (RHP) carefully
- Consult with a certified financial advisor before investing
- Invest only surplus funds you can afford to lose
- This is not a buy/sell recommendation
Investment decisions are solely your responsibility. Do your own due diligence.
📚 Additional Resources
- Red Herring Prospectus (RHP): Available on BSE/NSE websites
- SEBI SCORES: For investor complaints (scores.gov.in)
- Company Financials: BSE/NSE filings section
- Peer Comparison: Azad Engineering, Dixon Technologies annual reports
#AequsIPO #IPO2025 #AerospaceInvesting #StockMarketIndia #IPOAnalysis #PrecisionManufacturing

